Skip to main content

Posts

Showing posts with the label History & Ideology

We Are the Beautiful Ones

I haven’t been able to stop thinking about a piece of 1960s mouse sociology . (A sentence I never thought I’d write. And yet, here we are.) It all started when I was at home, doomscrolling on Instagram , and a video about a mouse utopia hijacked my feed. In 1968, an ethologist named John B. Calhoun built a perfect world. He called it “ Universe 25 .” It was a sterile Eden , engineered for perfection: unlimited food, no predators, no disease. Its purpose was to answer a haunting question. What happens when all the old struggles vanish? The result was a catastrophe. The population surged, but society did not. Calhoun documented the unraveling: “The social organisation of the animals showed equal disruption… The one activity most rapidly disrupted was the emergence of organised maternal behaviour.” Mothers abandoned their pups. The enclosure was filled with bodies, yet it was utterly emptied of purpose. He called this collapse the “ behavioural sink ,” a process that “collects anima...

Walter Benjamin’s Theses on the Philosophy of History – A Simple and Playful Explanation

Most people imagine history like a toy train on a track. The train moves forward, yesterday, today, tomorrow, and many believe it is heading towards a better future. They think the world keeps improving over time, one smooth stop after another. But Walter Benjamin says, “Hold on, that’s not quite right.” He tells us that history is not a straight, happy track. Instead, it is more like standing in front of a huge pile of broken toys. Every toy in the pile represents something that went wrong in the past, such as wars, unfair treatment, or people who suffered and were forgotten. That pile is what the past really looks like when we stop and pay attention. Benjamin describes an “Angel of History” who sees this sad pile and wants to stop and fix it, to help the people who were hurt. But a strong wind called “progress” keeps pushing the angel forward, away from the wreckage and towards the future. The angel cannot stop to help because the world just keeps rushing ahead. Benjamin’s p...

The "shopping trolley test" – a simple but profound ethical litmus test that Israel fails catastrophically

The true measure of moral character is not how one behaves under scrutiny, but what one does when no one is watching. As Plato warned in  The Republic , “The measure of a man is what he does when no one is watching.” This principle underpins the so-called “ shopping trolley test ”,  a deceptively simple test of conscience: will you return the trolley when no one will reward or punish you for doing so? Israel fails this test spectacularly. With over 50,000 civilians dead in Gaza, entire neighbourhoods levelled, and a decades-long apartheid system documented by Amnesty International as “a cruel system of domination and a crime against humanity,” Israel’s actions reveal not simply moral failure, but the total abandonment of ethical restraint. And unlike the shopping trolley, this test is not theoretical. It leaves real children starving. It buries real families beneath rubble. Plato’s parable of the Ring of Gyges , in which a man becomes invisible and thus unaccountable, re...

A Moral Reckoning: Britain’s Past, Present and the Promise of Sanctuary

Eighty years after ‘never again’, Britain faces a moral crossroads on asylum – will we fail again? We stand at a crossroads of conscience, where the ghosts of our past whisper urgent lessons we ignore at our peril. The foundations of our asylum laws were laid in the bitter soil of regret, watered by tears we should have shed eighty years ago but never did. When Jewish families begged for sanctuary from the horrors of Nazism , our doors stayed shut. Ships were turned away. Visas were denied . Lives were lost, not by accident, but by decision, buried under paperwork and prejudice. The same arguments used back then echo in today’s debates. We’re told that desperate souls will ‘change the character of our nation’, that Britain can’t absorb them, that they might be criminals or terrorists. The newspapers of the 1930s could almost be mistaken for today’s, so familiar is the rhetoric of rejection. That shameful chapter was not just history’s judgement, but a betrayal of the values Britain cl...

What is the Dark Enlightenment?

 Dark Enlightenment is a political and social philosophy that critiques modern democracy, progressive ideals, and egalitarianism. It was popularized by Curtis Yarvin (who writes under the pseudonym Mencius Moldbug) and Nick Land, the latter of whom coined the term. The movement is often associated with anti-democratic, elitist, and hierarchical worldviews, advocating for alternative systems of governance and a return to traditional values. Key Ideas of the Dark Enlightenment 1. Critique of Democracy: Dark Enlightenment thinkers argue that democracy is unstable, inefficient, and prone to corruption. They believe it encourages short-term thinking and undermines traditional hierarchies. 2. Rejection of Progressivism: The movement opposes the progressive narrative of continuous social improvement, viewing it as destructive to social cohesion and cultural heritage. 3. Advocacy for Alternative Systems: Proponents often support older forms of governance, such as monarchy, aristocracy, or ...