How Governments Are Killing Protest and What Comes Next
They changed the rules, resistance learns new forms.
Across the globe, the right to protest is under assault. The street, once a site of public power, is now being treated as a crime scene. From London to Delhi, Paris to Washington, governments are rewriting the rules to silence dissent. They are not hiding it. They are accelerating it.
In the United States, Donald Trump has made his intentions brutally clear. He wants to revoke the visas of pro-Palestine protesters, label climate activists as terrorists, and invoke the Insurrection Act to crush demonstrations. He has promised to deport so-called radical leftists and his allies are drafting laws to define protest as a form of domestic terrorism. Opposition is being recast as treason.
The United Kingdom is not far behind. The Public Order Act 2023 hands police sweeping powers to shut down protests before they even happen. Serious Disruption Prevention Orders can restrict someone’s freedom of movement or association without them ever committing a crime. You can now be arrested simply for being near a protest. These are not measures for safety. They are tools for control.
This is not an isolated trend. In France, new anti-riot laws target demonstrations. In India, anti-CAA protests were met with brutal crackdowns. Around the world, protest is no longer seen as a democratic right. It is being treated as a threat to be neutralised.
Why now? Because mass mobilisation works. From the Black Lives Matter uprisings to climate strikes to pro-Palestine marches, people have shown they can shift public debate, challenge institutions, and change policy. The powerful have noticed. Rather than respond to the message, they are choosing to criminalise the messenger.
It is not just about brute force. It is digital too. The state now uses facial recognition, predictive policing, and social media surveillance to target organisers before they ever reach the street. Protesters are being watched long before they gather. Silence is no longer achieved by dispersing crowds. It is engineered in advance.
This authoritarian reflex is spreading. Trump, Sunak, Meloni, Modi, all see public protest not as democratic participation but as disorder. They do not want to address demands. They want to make sure no one dares to raise them.
So what do we do when protest becomes impossible? When you can be arrested for showing up, and ignored if you stay silent? When the cost of dissent is too high for most to bear?
We adapt. And we shift the pressure elsewhere.
The street is not the only battlefield. There is a new playbook now. It is smaller, smarter, and much harder to suppress. Mutual aid networks are growing. Encrypted platforms are connecting organisers safely. Bail funds are standing ready. And strikes, especially general labour actions, remain among the few tools that governments cannot easily criminalise. When German transport workers walked out, they did not need placards to shut things down.
International pressure still matters. When UK climate protesters were jailed, global outcry followed. Repression thrives in silence. Exposure still works.
Culture matters too. Protest does not always need slogans or stages. Art, music, street projections, and symbolic actions all disrupt without providing an easy excuse for arrest. The aim is not always confrontation. It is persistence. Visibility. Friction.
But this is not only about protest. It is about the future of dissent itself. Will the next generation still have the right to object? Or are we watching that right being slowly dismantled before our eyes?
Britain has never been shy of protest. It is part of our history. From the Chartists to the suffragettes, the miners’ strikes to the Iraq War marches, taking to the streets has always been how ordinary people made themselves heard. But with draconian legislation, aggressive policing, and a cost-of-living crisis that leaves little time or energy for activism, many are being locked out of protest altogether. And that is by design. Exhaust the people and they will stay quiet.
But if the streets are blocked, we will flood the corridors of power. If they shut down marches, we will choke the machinery of the state. Legally. Relentlessly.
The Paper War
Bureaucracy is the state’s shield, but it can be turned against them. Every government department lives in fear of paperwork. Under the Freedom of Information Act, any citizen can demand internal documents. Want to jam the Home Office? Request every email referring to the Rwanda deportation scheme. Make the request complex. When they delay or redact, appeal to the Information Commissioner’s Office. Then do it again. And again. Make them drown in their own red tape.
GDPR as Sabotage
Under data protection laws, you can request all personal information held by any public body and ask for it to be deleted. HMRC, the DWP, your local council, all must comply within thirty days. Now imagine thousands doing this at once. The resulting backlog would paralyse them. Bureaucracy does not scale well. Break it legally and repeatedly.
Consultations: Weaponised
Government consultations exist because they believe no one will read them. Prove them wrong. When a new policy is open for feedback, submit your objections. Submit hundreds. Use AI to create thousands of unique responses. The point is not to change minds. It is to grind the system down with engagement they cannot ignore.
The Correspondence Blitz
Every MP is required to respond to their constituents. The Prime Minister’s office reads incoming mail. They rely on the assumption that hardly anyone writes. Break that. Send emails. Post letters. Call their offices. Do not copy and paste. Make each message specific and personal. Ask questions they cannot ignore. Demand clarity. Publish their replies. Shame them if they dodge. Pressure works best when it is persistent and impossible to ignore.
A single letter may be dismissed. Thousands arriving each week is a political crisis.
Slow Resistance
If you work inside the system, you are in a position to resist quietly. “Lose” a file. “Misread” a rule to help someone. Delay, stall, and obstruct harmful decisions. Show compassion, then blame staff shortages. Civil service runs on silent cooperation. You do not owe them that.
Leak, Shame, Repeat
FOIA requests have brought down ministers and exposed scandals. Do not wait for journalists. Anyone can request internal data and publish it. Build shadow reports. Track benefit sanction deaths. Publish NHS backlogs. Put their failures in the public eye. Truth is still a weapon. Use it.
Why This Works
Because the British establishment counts on passivity. It survives not through strength, but through the assumption that no one will fight back. But the system is fragile. It cannot cope with coordinated non-compliance. It breaks when too many people stop pretending it works.
This is not about disruption for its own sake. It is about refusing to let them control the terms of dissent. It is about reminding them that silence is not consent.
The Choice Ahead
The next decade will not be defined by how many marches we hold, but by how strategically we resist. As protest becomes criminalised, resistance will move into consultations, inboxes, courtrooms, and council meetings. It will appear in small refusals, in slowdowns, in data leaks, and in campaigns that choke power through its own rules.
The question is not whether we will fight. The question is whether we will act faster than the system can shut us down.
Your move, Whitehall.
In the United States, Donald Trump has made his intentions brutally clear. He wants to revoke the visas of pro-Palestine protesters, label climate activists as terrorists, and invoke the Insurrection Act to crush demonstrations. He has promised to deport so-called radical leftists and his allies are drafting laws to define protest as a form of domestic terrorism. Opposition is being recast as treason.
The United Kingdom is not far behind. The Public Order Act 2023 hands police sweeping powers to shut down protests before they even happen. Serious Disruption Prevention Orders can restrict someone’s freedom of movement or association without them ever committing a crime. You can now be arrested simply for being near a protest. These are not measures for safety. They are tools for control.
This is not an isolated trend. In France, new anti-riot laws target demonstrations. In India, anti-CAA protests were met with brutal crackdowns. Around the world, protest is no longer seen as a democratic right. It is being treated as a threat to be neutralised.
Why now? Because mass mobilisation works. From the Black Lives Matter uprisings to climate strikes to pro-Palestine marches, people have shown they can shift public debate, challenge institutions, and change policy. The powerful have noticed. Rather than respond to the message, they are choosing to criminalise the messenger.
It is not just about brute force. It is digital too. The state now uses facial recognition, predictive policing, and social media surveillance to target organisers before they ever reach the street. Protesters are being watched long before they gather. Silence is no longer achieved by dispersing crowds. It is engineered in advance.
This authoritarian reflex is spreading. Trump, Sunak, Meloni, Modi, all see public protest not as democratic participation but as disorder. They do not want to address demands. They want to make sure no one dares to raise them.
So what do we do when protest becomes impossible? When you can be arrested for showing up, and ignored if you stay silent? When the cost of dissent is too high for most to bear?
We adapt. And we shift the pressure elsewhere.
The street is not the only battlefield. There is a new playbook now. It is smaller, smarter, and much harder to suppress. Mutual aid networks are growing. Encrypted platforms are connecting organisers safely. Bail funds are standing ready. And strikes, especially general labour actions, remain among the few tools that governments cannot easily criminalise. When German transport workers walked out, they did not need placards to shut things down.
International pressure still matters. When UK climate protesters were jailed, global outcry followed. Repression thrives in silence. Exposure still works.
Culture matters too. Protest does not always need slogans or stages. Art, music, street projections, and symbolic actions all disrupt without providing an easy excuse for arrest. The aim is not always confrontation. It is persistence. Visibility. Friction.
But this is not only about protest. It is about the future of dissent itself. Will the next generation still have the right to object? Or are we watching that right being slowly dismantled before our eyes?
Britain has never been shy of protest. It is part of our history. From the Chartists to the suffragettes, the miners’ strikes to the Iraq War marches, taking to the streets has always been how ordinary people made themselves heard. But with draconian legislation, aggressive policing, and a cost-of-living crisis that leaves little time or energy for activism, many are being locked out of protest altogether. And that is by design. Exhaust the people and they will stay quiet.
But if the streets are blocked, we will flood the corridors of power. If they shut down marches, we will choke the machinery of the state. Legally. Relentlessly.
The Paper War
Bureaucracy is the state’s shield, but it can be turned against them. Every government department lives in fear of paperwork. Under the Freedom of Information Act, any citizen can demand internal documents. Want to jam the Home Office? Request every email referring to the Rwanda deportation scheme. Make the request complex. When they delay or redact, appeal to the Information Commissioner’s Office. Then do it again. And again. Make them drown in their own red tape.
GDPR as Sabotage
Under data protection laws, you can request all personal information held by any public body and ask for it to be deleted. HMRC, the DWP, your local council, all must comply within thirty days. Now imagine thousands doing this at once. The resulting backlog would paralyse them. Bureaucracy does not scale well. Break it legally and repeatedly.
Consultations: Weaponised
Government consultations exist because they believe no one will read them. Prove them wrong. When a new policy is open for feedback, submit your objections. Submit hundreds. Use AI to create thousands of unique responses. The point is not to change minds. It is to grind the system down with engagement they cannot ignore.
The Correspondence Blitz
Every MP is required to respond to their constituents. The Prime Minister’s office reads incoming mail. They rely on the assumption that hardly anyone writes. Break that. Send emails. Post letters. Call their offices. Do not copy and paste. Make each message specific and personal. Ask questions they cannot ignore. Demand clarity. Publish their replies. Shame them if they dodge. Pressure works best when it is persistent and impossible to ignore.
A single letter may be dismissed. Thousands arriving each week is a political crisis.
Slow Resistance
If you work inside the system, you are in a position to resist quietly. “Lose” a file. “Misread” a rule to help someone. Delay, stall, and obstruct harmful decisions. Show compassion, then blame staff shortages. Civil service runs on silent cooperation. You do not owe them that.
Leak, Shame, Repeat
FOIA requests have brought down ministers and exposed scandals. Do not wait for journalists. Anyone can request internal data and publish it. Build shadow reports. Track benefit sanction deaths. Publish NHS backlogs. Put their failures in the public eye. Truth is still a weapon. Use it.
Why This Works
Because the British establishment counts on passivity. It survives not through strength, but through the assumption that no one will fight back. But the system is fragile. It cannot cope with coordinated non-compliance. It breaks when too many people stop pretending it works.
This is not about disruption for its own sake. It is about refusing to let them control the terms of dissent. It is about reminding them that silence is not consent.
The Choice Ahead
The next decade will not be defined by how many marches we hold, but by how strategically we resist. As protest becomes criminalised, resistance will move into consultations, inboxes, courtrooms, and council meetings. It will appear in small refusals, in slowdowns, in data leaks, and in campaigns that choke power through its own rules.
The question is not whether we will fight. The question is whether we will act faster than the system can shut us down.
Your move, Whitehall.
Comments
Post a Comment